From: Sven M. Hallberg <pesco@khjk.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 20:01:58 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: comment about IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESS_DNS_ELIGIBLE (should we use it?)
X-Git-Url: http://git.meshlink.io/?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;h=7027b5ba057bac04b83c891efd102155173b773b;hp=e9b471dc34c6b4b13c362658f89f1711486f0777;p=catta

comment about IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESS_DNS_ELIGIBLE (should we use it?)
---

diff --git a/src/iface-windows.c b/src/iface-windows.c
index 729e3c4..5ad1460 100644
--- a/src/iface-windows.c
+++ b/src/iface-windows.c
@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ static void ip_adapter_unicast_address(CattaInterfaceMonitor *m,
     }
 
     // set global scope flag
+    // XXX should we use the IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESS_DNS_ELIGIBLE flag for this?
+    //     it looks like it gets set for IPv4 addresses that are not localhost
+    //     and for IPv6 addresses with global scope. not sure about multicast
+    //     addresses.
     if(addr.proto == CATTA_PROTO_INET6)
         ifaddr->global_scope = !(IN6_IS_ADDR_LINKLOCAL((struct in6_addr *)addr.data.data)
                                  || IN6_IS_ADDR_MULTICAST((struct in6_addr *)addr.data.data));